Author
No results available
The case arose from the aftermath of the Abraaj Group’s collapse. The Respondent, a limited partner in the Neoma Private Equity Fund IV L.P. (formerly Abraaj Buyout Fund IV L.P.), disputed its capital account balance (CAB), which exceeded a $50 million difference from the general partner’s assessment. The Respondent sought extensive disclosure to verify its position, citing section 22 of the ELPA and its rights under the fund’s Limited Partnership Agreement.
The Grand Court granted summary judgment compelling disclosure. The Appellants, represented by Susan Prevezer KC and James Kennedy of KSG Attorneys at Law, challenged this decision, arguing the scope of section 22 had been misapplied.
The Court of Appeal’s Findings
The Court of Appeal overturned the Grand Court’s decision, holding that:
Significance for Fund Managers and Investors
This ruling introduces a more measured, context-dependent interpretation of statutory disclosure rights under Cayman law. It underscores the need for fund managers to ensure that limited partners receive adequate insight—without necessarily granting unrestricted access to internal documentation.
The decision will be of particular relevance to those managing or investing in offshore structures, reinforcing the importance of a transparent yet practicable approach to information rights.
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 2 days ago
posted 2 days ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message